Upcoming Guests on Inside the Eye - Live!

Visit Inside the Eye - Live!, the new website for Inside the Eye - Live! radio show with The Fetch!

Show starts at 10:00am Eastern Call in or listen live!

Show Archives (including show summaries) from Apr 1, 2013. Previous show archives (without show summaries here).

Important note to visitors. Blogger has changed the HTML code used when this blog was originally created. What that means is that some pictures may not load, or pictures have disappeared from original linking URL's and are no longer available. Fixing any picture requires an entire reload of all pictures so that the pictures work with HTTPS, or Blogger will not allow any in story photo updates. Pages are currently being updated (freshened up). Be patient as pages get updated. Updates are based on various page use/visit priorities.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

English Gematria and the Apperception of the Conceptual

Gematria, by it's very definition, is intricately linked to achieving an apperception of the conceptual. After all, if one of the primary definitions of Gematria is a "system by which hidden truths and meanings are discovered within words", then by virtue of such one should be able to transcend to an apperception of the conceptual.

Gematria, in a very general sense, involves the affixing of Letters to Numbers and to Sounds in an inseparable string. The primary Illuminatus source document regarding this idea is the Book of Formation, also known as "the Sepher Yetzirah":

"In thirty-two mysterious Paths of Wisdom did Jah, the Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel, the Living Elohim, the King of ages, the merciful and gracious God, the Exalted One, the Dweller in eternity, most high and holy--engrave his name by the three Sepharim --Numbers, Letters, and Sounds."

The conscious comprehension that Numbers are fused to Letters which are further fused to sounds opens immense direct channels to an apperception of the conceptual, but there still remains the physical work and reasoning working with the new found concept such that insights are able to be gathered such that an apperception of the conceptual can be achieved.

The Apperception of the Conceptual

The Apperception of the Conceptual implies a layered ability to penetrate reality. This ability serves as the basic definition of "discovering hidden meanings within words' through the use of Number. In the case of the number 1919, this can be divided into the Letters SS, for S is the 19th Letter of the Alphabet. The idea of the SS is then fused to the very symbol of the Swastika, which in this example is using a rounded outer form.

But with the Apperception of the Conceptual, the Thule Symbol is so rich with nuanced meaning as to defy a rational analysis from traditional academic points of view. For instance, the use of the letters SS, or the double rune Sigurd, was traditionally regarded as a curse to the Germans, substituting the double rune with the elongated "f".

However, as we know that the various mythologies are merely cultural transpositions of the same mythological source, we can trace the parallels in mythology to gain a further comprehension of the Apperception of the Conceptual.

In the case of the Double Rune Sigurd (SS), we can note that the word BI BLE includes a prefix of BI and a root of BLE. Using Gematria, we can show that BLE has values of 2+12+5=19, and hence a BI-BLE would be simply another form of the Double Rune Sigurd, or SS, for BI-BLE = Double S, or SS.

We then seek further into the story of Sigurd and we find that "Years later, with Sinjotli dead, Sigmund remarries in order to carry on the Volsung line; Odin intervenes to take his life before the child is born. The son, named Sigurd, thus inherits all the strength of his father. Reforging Sigmunds sword, he kills the dragon Fafnir" and a curse is laid down.

The parallels allow you to penetrate the Conceptual. The Double Rune Sigurd can be equated to the Father and the Son, for the Father, Sigmund, although dashed, still is able to carry on the line in the form of Sigurd. Thus the SS of the BI-BLE shows a similar parallel. Jesus as the Son is sought to be destroyed before he can rise, but using the remnants of his fathers religion (Judaism), the existing Setian religion of Judaism was able to rise again with the assistance of the son with the intent to destroy European Pagan institutions, themselves heavily influenced by Osiris and Isis systems.

Thus in the diagram above, with the descending sword as pictured, we can infer that the drawing agents were invoking Sigurds reforged sword (S) to become his own (S), and so we have powerful and yet subtle archetypal imagery aimed at the unawares. Further, with the intentional focus of the "1919" as being "SS", fused to the "SS" of the Swastika, the imagery becomes almost oppressive in nature.

These people knew what they were doing, and since the imagery was purely Setian in focus and intent, the negative aspects of the movement could be readily ascertained. That does not mean that power existed to halt the movement and its intentions, but clearly trouble was brewing and we may gain insights into the political agendas of the movements in question through a rational analysis of how current and past symbols were being employed.

Thick as a Brick as an Exercise in the Conceptual

In Morton Smith's "Jesus the Magician", Morton Smith tells of a 3rd century joke whereby Jesus, petulant and self centered, was rejected by his master. Distraught and forlorn, Jesus returned home and worshiped a brick as if it was his master. The idea that Jesus was worshiping a brick, too, finds its way into various Jewish Talmudic texts, whereby we find in Sotah7a,

"Sotah 47a: “Jesus was excommunicated by a Rabbi; Jesus worshipped a brick;
Jesus was a magician and led Israel astray.”"

Of course, the Conceptual is lost if you allow yourself to be led here or there. Nothing is changing. The basic framework remains the SS, or the Double Rune Sigurd. What is changing is a conceptual shift relative to local significance. Jesus as a movement was based on Osirian mysticism, whereby much of what would become the Catholic Church was essentially ripped and modified codes from Osirian Systems.

But it was and remains Setianist at its core yet saving much of the good contained in Osirian systems.

Mathew 34-36

"Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. "For I have come to 'set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law'; and 'a man's enemies will be those of his own household." It's intent was to destroy, but it could not do so without fusing politically and esoteric symbolic formulations already in full use. A compromise would have to be made, and so much of what was Osirian knowledge was able to be preserved in the new found religion.

The seeds of destruction, however, were planted.

By trying to build his foundation on that of "the Father", or Jehovah/Typhon/Seth, Christianity was doomed as a mechanism to bring down Setianism. So Jesus, worshiping a "brick", was just more conceptual foundational material being injected into the material. The "brick" would become "the Wailing Wall".

Sigurd as an S is using the reforged sword of Sigmung the Father as an S and so Jesus as an S is using the "wailing wall", or "brick" as an S. The Thule Society and the SS and the 1919 and the revolving double S Swastika are still the same energetical channels and invoking the same daemonic forces.

Thus we find in Ian Anderson's "Thick as a Brick",

"But your new shoes are worn at the heels and
your suntan does rapidly peel and
your wise men don't know how it feels to be thick as a brick."

Now imagine the armies of Christian missionaries through time who have spread "the Word", even as they so many knew not (but clearly some did) the foundational structure of "the Word"? Is the BRICK simply another manifestation of an Occult and corrupted version of "the Word"?

"See there! A son is born -- and we pronounce him fit to fight.
There are black-heads on his shoulders, and he pees himself in the night.
make a man of him
put him to trade
teach him
to play Monopoly and
to sing in the rain."

The Conceptual is already established. Sigmund and Jesus come to fight, and in the case of Jesus, it became the same monopolistic thought control as was and remains the core of Setian systems. In such systems there is little tolerance for any voice of authority save for the head.

Mathew 37-39 - "He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. {38} "And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. {39} "He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it."

"And the youngest of the family is moving with authority.
Building castles by the sea, he dares the tardy tide to wash them all aside". - Thick as a Brick"

Now imagine the spreading of Missions across the America's and elsewhere, with the awakening of the human spirit being the "tardy tide" meant to wash away these older Piscean systems.

"I've come down from the upper class to mend your rotten ways.
My father was a man-of-power whom everyone obeyed.
So come on all you criminals!
I've got to put you straight just like I did with my old man --
twenty years too late.
Your bread and water's going cold.
Your hair is too short and neat.
I'll judge you all and make damn sure that no-one judges me."

Now imagine the young Christian church. The clue is "your bread and water's going cold", a reference to the rite or ritual of "communion", while the hair being short and neat a reference to the salesman attire of the missionary manners.

And still. Their wise men don't know how it feels to be thick as a brick.


Anonymous said...

ok im just gonna ask it

with all this son sun worship its seems as though its all about

sun worship

indians believe we go to the stars when we die which means

something made the sun but what?

ive always felt that the sun of earth is a portal of some sort and all the other stars are prisons or other somethings for or against the sun of earth and its maker

so, what is the suns maker?

if the sun is the logos of "God" then what is "God"

it isnt the same God as the Queen worships

no way no how

there seems to be a buzz around her and if everyone on earth thinks that energy isnt going somewhere you got another thing comin cause it GOES

or becomes potentially potential ;p

i guess heh

so we worship the sun because it IS afterall greater than ourselves and we should know how we are functioning with this sun so we can get to its maker and be where all the others that passed through this portal / Gods sun

so while they worship the Sun
we worship Jesus

and Jesus isnt the SUN SUN, but someones son???

or did they hijack the name to steal some energetic force to use against us

or they are just ripping everyone off with this great scam of jesus etc while they worship the sun and they get to do something while we do nothing because we were lied to

so, what is this beyond the SUN thing, and i still ask

whats the point?

some believe that God needed to define its self (whatever a God self would be) and chaos is older than the God we perhaps think, might be -- God.

order out of chaos.

beings trying to define themselves is a twisted kind of thing

and so is boredom.

so, what now.

to know thyself.

what does this mean really? that im connected and made up of the stars and space matter out everywhere? that im dust and im water and im clay and im energy and im a part of the creator of the Sun and the Sun

but we should not pretend any thing else is the Sun. even if Antares if larger than the earth's Sun

its for you here now to live and nothing else is and it keeps everything in check and it can always reach you and it dies on the cross of the vernal equinox every year... its reborn from 22 dec solstice on 25 dec

when its born virgo the virgin is there...

gold is not the Sun even though it is its symbol / idol to *some* folks as is oil and drugs which funny thing, spells GOD and i know all those things did not make God or have anything to do with the sun

like i said

so now what?!

worship the sun and know thyself?


Marc Jones said...

The construct, thus, leaves many questions, as per above comment. You're likely referring to the galactic core, as the sun behind the sun, which is a binary. So no doubt; sowilo/sowilo - SS. I jest.

The two characters Sigurd and Jesus are hero figures... Anyone who's read Deceptions and myths in the bible will know that all stories and characters therein were creation science (the grand process) motifs.

Thus choose your filters as anything goes. Ie., Bi ble = SS. I've never ever read that ss was considered a curse. SS and swastika...but elsewhere it's F's. Looks like it could be L's as well.

I see the trends Herr Fetcho has highlighted. Outstanding astuteness if you found all that yourself. I really can't say if this is read back into it or was fashioned as such as you say.

You mention the one eyed god in various contexts relating to the construct. Odin. Tyr was the one handed god and we're still looking how he was co-opted into same. Looks like not.