If you have been following the Illuminatus Observor long enough, you are familiar with the concept of two distinct Occult forces in play. Each of these forces is a part of the larger "narrative", wherein "the narrative" may be defined as "the Construct". These terms, "the narrative" and "the Construct" are, perhaps, foreign to many of you who have sought to ascertain certain "truths" as you have peered into the fundamentals of Occult philosophy.
"The Construct" is the larger philosophical reality as it has been caste into the Alphabet and fused to archetypal realities. It should be presumed that all alphabets have their own unique philosophical reality fused or imbed into them. It may appear presumptous to state that the 26 digit alphabet that makes up the English alphabet is the primary key, but a comprehensive research into these matters reveals, if even in the form of conjecture, that the key to the larger Illuminatus philosophy is based on the 26.
One way to "prove" this idea, or conjecture, is to understand that language is really a series of modifications and transposition between any given set of languages.
In English, we use the letter T to denote the digit 10. This makes perfect rational sense because D is located at 4 and 1+2+3+4 = 10. The Letter T as shown in the Isisian Codes is really sharing the same value placement as the Letter D, or 4, and so it must have a value of 10. To further show this, English is crafted against a series of mathematical formulas that reveal "the Construct". Hence the word "seventy" can just as easily be rewritten in "notaricon", or shorthand, as the formula 7T. Phonetically we have done nothing, but we have created a modification from the word "seventy" to the formula "7T".
The point here is that it is irrational to assume that T means anything OTHER than "ten", or "10", and so we may safely assume that our Isisian Code matrix is philosophically (Qaballistically) properly constructed so as to reveal the core of the larger esoteric code.
At the same time, we have within the larger philosophical system a fusing of philosophical and esoteric realities to the parts of speech. These philosophical or archetypal fabrications bore all the way down to the types of sounds. This is basic Occult knowledge, for the Sepher Yetzirah, or Book of Formation, clearly states that the larger philosophical system is set against, or holds as its frame or skeleton, a system based on Letters, Numbers, and Sounds.
In English, one of these "types" of sounds is known as "the Dentals". English is unique in that many words emulate the sounds that are heard. Examples of this include words as "buzz" as in the "buzz of a bee", "pop", "crack", and so forth. Equally, this fabrication within English extends, or bores down to, the forms of sounds.
One such sound is known as "Dentals". Dentals are sounded by placing the tongue against the inner gum of the upper front teeth. These sounds are the sounds of the Letters D, N, and T, with each sound modified through the Letter E. (ref: DEE, EN, and TEE). Hence the word DENTAL is really encoding the very sounds that are made that comprise the DENTALS, or the sounds D, N, and T.
At this stage we must invoke "reason" as alluded to by Plutarch,
"For this reason Plato and Aristotle call this part of the philosophy the epoptic or mystic part, inasmuch as those who have passed beyond these conjectural and confused matters of all sorts by means of REASON proceed by leaps and bounds to that primary, simple, and immaterial principle; and when they have somehow attained contact with the pure truth abiding about it, they think that they have the whole of the philosophy completely, as it were, within their grasp."
Reason tells us that IF (the Letter E is invoked here) the Sounds of D and T are equal to 10, and N too is a DENTAL, then N too must have a value of 10. The above diagram of Egyptian letters shows too that the design of the Egyptian 10 is the exact same glyph as the lower case Letter "n"
Relative to languages, a transposition or modification may be found between the English and the Arabic, for each language uses the same form of code, which is to add a DENTAL to the end of the primary word that denotes the single digit sound.
English "4" = FOUR. It's multiple of 10 is denoted as FORTY, or 4T, hence preserving the formula of 4 times "the DENTAL", which is T.
Arabic "4" = ARBA. It's multiple of 1o is denoted as ARBA-een, hence preserving the formula of "4" times "the DENTAL", which is N.
This provides you with an example of a "modification" and a "transposition" from one language to another, yet equally preserves the core of the mathematics underlying the larger Philosophical System. It equally hints at the fabrication of what is termed "the Construct".
What is revealed is that English is very clear and relatively unocculted, reducing down to a "least common denominator", as it were, and hence is viewed as being "pure" and if not "uncorrupted", it may be argued regardless that it is far less "corrupted", or if one prefers, "perfected", even as we can see that in two primary languages, Arabic and English, the core of the code is preserved in each of the languages design.
English as the Core Occult Language
If English is so powerful, why has it seemingly "lost" the battle to control the definitions within the larger Occult war? There are many reasons for this, perhaps, and not a few of them being metaphysical or trans-dimensional in nature. These can be debated and discussed and perhaps the exercise would be quite fascinating; however, the primary reason for its seeming failure to control the larger Occult war is that it was designed in such a way as to incorporate its rival and arch enemy into the design.
The purpose for this is, again, many, and not the least of which was the belief that if one is able to rise above this arch enemy, as it were, then would attain through the process a state of existence known as "enlightenment" or "illumination".
The principle element to this part of the "narrative" or "philosophy" was a belief that mankind was "drowned" in what is termed a universal archetype known as "the Deluge". This "Deluge" was known to be brought about by the "god of the Jews"; however, this "god" was always known to be the "demiurge" of the Gnostics, the great "evil" or "satan". For the masses, the Construct was deliberately inverted - that which was light was called "darkness" and that which was "dark" was termed as being "of the light". However, within the various Secret Societies in the West, the truth of Jewish worship of a dark energy was always known and to the higher level Jewish occultists (which include their many "gentile" offshoots), this worship of a darker force was too very well known.
"But those who relate that Typhon's flight from the battle was made on the back of an ass and lasted for seven days and that after he made his escape, he became the father of sons, Hierosolymus and Judaeus, are manifestly, as the very names show, attempting to drag Jewish traditions into the legend."
Through the inclusion of Christianity into the legends, Setianism was able to garner a foothold into the core of Western Mystery Traditions. Osiris was replaced by "CHRIST" as the new "El", the word CHRST formed as it is from the shape of the Letter L, preserved still the core of the code.
This preservation of a key part of the larger philosophical system served the Western esoteric elite well, for what was their arch enemy also proved useful in preserving the core of the system which, it could be surmised, later retrieved in a more enlightened time and revealed once again. At the Elite of Western esoteric traditions, there was little credibility for the Jewish inclusion into the Mysteries other than to use the foreign culture to preserve core elements to the larger system.
Even as late as the 1600's we find a disdain for the inclusion of Jewish systems in the larger Western construct. Says Cornelius Agrippa on his "Cabalie of the Jews",
"Hence it is, that the Jews, who are most skilful in using the names of God, can operate little or nothing after Christ, as their ancient fathers did; but that we by experience find, and see, that the revolution of this art (as they call them) oftentimes wonderful sentences, full of great mysteries, are wrested from the holy Scriptures, this is nothing then the certain playing upon Allegories, which idle men busying themselves with all the points, letters, and numbers, which this tongue and the custome of writing do easily suffer, do fain and disguise at their pleasures; which although sometimes they hold forth great mysteries, yet they can never prove nor evince any thing, but we may (according to the words of Gregory) with the same faculty contemn them, as they are affirmed."
Even as late as the early 1900's we find historical evidence that Jewish traditions were still far from believed to be remotely clued into the larger esoteric Construct, even as a reliance on Jewish, or Rabbincal Kabballah, had found increasing acceptance. However, to assume that Jewish "Kabballah" was always a "first and foremost key" to the Mysteries is a very careless assumption that can only lead one away from ascertaining the root of the Philosophy.
"So I acknowledge that this Cabalistic art, which the Hebrews brag of, and I sometimes diligently and laboriously sought after, is nothing else then a meer rhapsody of superstition, and a certain Theurgical Magick: but if it proceeded from God (as the Jews boast) and conduceth to the perfection of life, health of men, to the worship of God, and to the truth of understanding; truly that spirit of truth, which hath left this Synogogue, and come to teach us all truth, would not have concealed it from his Church even untill these last times, which indeed knoweth all things that of God, whose benediction, baptism, and other mysteries of salvation are revealed and perfected in every tongue, for every tongue hath the same equal power..."
It is clear that early Western esoteric Elites held Jewish "esoteric" constructions "in perspective", borrowing what was known to be valuable and, essentially, shunning or ignoring the larger body of Jewish kabballistic work.
For Jews to become relevant, they were going to have to incorporate quite secret formulae into their esoteric construction. This could only be done through an infiltration of the great body of Western esoteric schools. These schools were quite busy, equally, like the third little pig, staying ahead of the infiltration to such a degree as to preserve unequivocally, the absolute nature of the philosophical Construct.
Utnapishtim and Noah, "Saviors of Mankind"
There is little doubt that Jewish scribes ripped off the Flood story from the Gilgamesh tale and turned it into their own. How it was altered or edited provides insightful keys to the way in which "esoteric" and "metaphysical" or "spiritual" channels are established and for what purpose such channels may exist.
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, Utnapishtim is the equivalent to the Jewish "Noah". Utnapishtim was said to have found favor "with the Gods" and so was apprised of the coming destruction of humanity under a "deluge" and so crafted a vessel upon which to rise above the waves. Noah, of course, is said equally to have found favor with "God" and so was apprised of the coming deluge and too constructed an "Ark" upon which to ride out the storm/
Where the stories are different point to the competing Occult, or political, agendas.
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, it is said of the god who caused or brought on the Flood, who is deemed as, for all intents and purposes, the "evil" god, yet a god in the company of the Gods nonetheless. Further, it becomes important to compare multiple translations as one cannot be so sure as to if any of the given translations are controlled by some Occult agenda.
For example -
In Tablet XI, the tablet upon which the story of the Deluge is set down, we find the following comparisons:
Then Enlil, on his arrival,
Spied out the vessel, and (straightaway) did Enlil burst into anger,
Swollen with wrath 'gainst the gods, the Igigi. Hath any of mortals
'Scaped? Sooth, never a man could have lived through (the welter of) ruin.'
(Then) did Ninurta make answer and speak unto warrior Enlil,
Saying: 'O, who can there be to devise such a plan, Except Ea?
Surely, 'tis Ea is privy to ev'ry design.' Whereat Ea
Answer'd and spake unto Enlil, the warrior, saying: 'O Chieftain
Thou of the god, thou warrior! How, forsooth, how (all) uncounsell'd
Couldst thou bring on a deluge?"
Sooth, indeed 'twas not I of the Great Gods the secret revealed,
(But) to th' Abounding in Wisdom vouchsafed I a dream, and (in this wise)
He of the gods heard the secret. Deliberate, now, on his counsel'.
When Enlil saw the boat he released
his calm reason and and let in the Igigi, monsters of blood.
"What force dares defy my anger?
How dare a man be still alive!?"
Then with these words Ninurta said to Enlil:
"Can any of us besided Ea, maker of words,
create such things as speech?"
Then with these words Ea himself said to Enlil:
and tough fighter,
how dare you drown so many little people
without consulting me?
I was not the one who revealed our god-awful secrets.
Blame Utnapishtim, Mr. Know-it-all,
who sees everything
who knows everything."
In each of the translations, Enlil is seen to have brought on the Deluge and is furious that anyonw has survived. Prior to Enlil coming to realise that someone had survived "the Deluge", the gods are sitting in counsel and Isis/Ishtar comments that Enlil is no longer welcome at the feast that Utnapishtim had prepared.
In the first translation, we find that Enlil's bringing on the flood is not only met with displeasure by the Counsel of the Gods, as it were, but that the only one of the gods capable of bringing on a Deluge was Ea, for none of the other gods could be seen as being competent enough to bring about such an event and, it can be surmised, keep the outcome under some level of control. It is Ea who knows "every design".
In the second translation, we see more clearly that it is Ea who is "the maker of words", while other translations reveal that Ea and Ea alone "knows the Word". The second translation really de-stories the myth. Only Ea can bring such things as "speech".
"Speech" is "the Deluge".
The key point to note, however, is that the latter Jewish, or Setianist, writers edited out the reality that the bringer of the Deluge did so without consultations and was regarded as a pariah among some of the other "gods". Whether this implies some "alien" race or other form of earlier "human" we cannot truly be certain, but the universal nature of the Flood story hints at a massive tradgedy brought about by an entity bent on destruction of the human creation.
The Deluge as a Core Illuminatus Construct
There are some stories or myths that have a Universal flavor, whether it is "Cain and Abel" or "the Deluge". There are reasons why this is might be so, and Plutarch pretty much says why this is so.
"I hesitate, lest this be the moving of things immovable and not only "warring against the long years of time", as Simonides has it, but warring, too, against "many a nation and race of men" who are possessed by a feeling of piety towards these gods..."
As our history has been altered and changed by the what we can only term "Setianist force" through the use of wars and other forms of pillage to destroy any and all evidence that might support the above statement, there still remains enough caste in stone and sacred architecture to remind us as to how mighty and pervasive the Osirian and Isisian Mysteries were on planet Earth.
The Temple of Candi Sukkoh in Indonesia, for example, clearly shows the archetypal framework for the Letters I and V as male and female, comprised as it is of the Square of 3 as I, the Square of 4 as V (V being 22 and 2*2 = 4 * 4 = 16 = P), to create the Letter Y, or "the Child" as spoken of by the Ancients and documented by Plutarch equally:
"One might conjecture that the Egyptians hold in high honour the most beautiful of the triangles, since they liken the nature of the Universe most closely to it, as Plato in the Republic seems to have made use of it in formulating his figure of marriage. This triangle has its upright or three units, its base of four, and its hypetenuse of five. The upright may be likened to the male, the base it the female, and the hypotenuse to the child of both..."
There was a universal nature to the mythologies because there was a universal priestcraft, or so it has been intimated in various mythologies, and this universal priestcraft hid the core philosophy through a series of transpositions and modifications. The more transpositions and modifications one is able to study, the clearer the picture of the core truth comes into focus.
Within Freemasonry, the Deluge played a critical role in the core of their mythology (as it should). However, the flaw, and perhaps fatal at that, was the process through which infiltration could alter the core teaching through the introduction of superstitions being imported as "core literal truths" as opposed to "core allegorical truths".
The reliance on superstitions as opposed to a rational analysis of the narrative gives rise to "godless atheism". Through an overt fusing of the Mysteries to "things Jewish" as an esoteric constructed word, the possibility arose that the superstitions of Jewish mythologies would become seen as "literal truths", and once this happened, the Craft could be set onto an irreversible decline into the Setianist orders.
Dr. Anderson and the Laws of Noachide
As we saw from Cornelius Agrippa, the idea that Jewish constructions have always been in favor is an historical fabrication. Those forces who were opposed to the totalitarian nature of the early Christian Church clearly knew full well the esoteric and organizational channels which brought about this total dependence on totalitarianism and intolerance.
Christianity, it could be argued, held out some beneficial attributes greatly removed from the core of Judaic thought, but still its growth and expansion, like most movements that rely on Setianist philosophy, was spread through a very overt militarism that was anathema to the Osirian idea of "conquoring" through the use of benevolence and persuasion.
Through the quite literal technique of conquoring foreign lands and then subjecting these lands to utter scorched Earth (witness what happened to Germany and Iraq, as two recent examples), these forces are able to destroy any and all evidence that might place their interpretation of the narrative into jeapardy.
The "academic shill cry" of "prove to us you are right" falls hollow upon the ears who has seen the evidence systematically destroyed. Only when one lacks historical reference and precedents is one able to fall prey to such literal "academic shenanigans".
One such "academic shenanigan" is that of the Deluge. If one has not the knowledge of Gilgamesh, one might then fall prey to the superstitions of those who claim that since Noah was the only one to have survived the Flood, then all humanity is therefore descended from Noah.
An absurd concept, really, but this absurd concept became enshrined into Freemasonry. The transformation of this "allegorical event" into a literal truth practiced by many could be seen as key to the early decay and destruction of the what was a pillar of Western esoteric thought.
From Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry we read,
"The descendants of Noah. A term applied to Freemasons on the theory, derived from the Legend of the Craft, that Noah was the father and founder of the Masonic system of theology. Hence the Freemason's claim to be his descendants, because in times past they preserved the pure principles of his religion amid the corruptions of surrounding faiths. Doctor Anderson first used the word in this sense in the second edition of the Book of Constitutions: "A Mason is obliged by his tenure to observe the moral law as a true Noachida" But he was not the inventor of the term, for it occurs in a letter sent by the Grand Lodge of England to the Grand Lodge of Calcutta in 1735"
In truth, this term would be edited out of editions 3 and 4 of the 5 printings, with the 5th printing accepting the term and it being enshrined within the Masonic system.
It was the literal use of this term that formally subjugated those elements of Freemasonry unsophisticated enough to clearly "get to" to that of the Setianist or Jewish god and for which so many of the world's rulers feel some moral obligation to uphold.
The irrational nature of such worship defies logic, for the nature of the Construct clearly reveals that Noachide is false, and we can ascertain this through the use of our English Qaballa.
Gilgamesh or Noachides?
As we have seen, the reliance on "Noah" as a progenitor akin to a literal truth creates a flawed and irrational understanding of the Mysteries. The purpose of the Mysteries is to rise above the Demiurge, wherein the Demiurge is seen as the one daemon who brought on the Deluge and condemned mankind to a seeming eternal darkness.
Through the historical record we know that many cultures hold that the god or daemon who brough on the Flood was a great evil, and Gilgamesh is a key hidden story to this very literal and yet, albeit, allegorical, truth.
We know that the primary loss was that of "the Word"? We know that the Occult, as defined by Odin (Osiris) hanging on the Tree (the 12th Card of the Tarot) for 9 days and 9 nights reveals the code word OCCULT.
We know that the use of Notaricon to the fabrication of the Star Spangled Banner reveals this very same code
(O)h = O
(S)ay = S = C
(C)an = C
You = U
(S)ee = S = 3 = L
By the Dawns Early Light = T = Sun coming up on horizon =
We know that the WORD is Pi. We know that English is constructed to reveal particular truths and shed light on the fallacies.
So who is right?
GILGAMESH and UTNAPISHTIM or NOAH?
GILGAMESH as a code is simple, and it uses a technique I call "The Who How Hop". This form of transposition forms words like:
SUMMER SOLSTICE = SIGN OF GEMINI = TWINS = T-WIN-T = WINTER (SUN of T hops to other side of the word to form the astrological construction in the word.
WHO = HOW
WHO is GILGAMESH
Reverse the word.
(SH) E (M+A=)N GLI (SH) = English and the Letter G is "the Greatest of them All" who crossed the Abyss and met with Utnapishtim who saved mankind through coming to know the Secrets of the Gods.
UTNAPISHTIM reverses to form MITHS IP ANT U, or the not so cryptic code of Myths, Pi, and You, the very real truth to the larger Construct.
NOAH is a duplicity word.
Does it mean NO A and H (meaning to remove Pi and hence the Word)?
Or does it mean KNOW A and H (and hence Pi and hence the Word?)"
This depends on the intent of the invoking agent, and if the invoking agent is "Jewish", by design it is saying to ignore and hence blind oneself to the true nature of the Construct.
Sadly, too many of todays Elites qualify themselves as "true Noachides" and are beholden to the latter interpretation of the word. As the Construct so clearly shows: only a fool would seek after a Noachide.