Upcoming Guests on Inside the Eye - Live!
Visit Inside the Eye - Live!, the new website for Inside the Eye - Live! radio show with The Fetch!
Show starts at 10:00am Eastern Call in or listen live!
Show Archives (including show summaries) from Apr 1, 2013. Previous show archives (without show summaries here).
Show starts at 10:00am Eastern Call in or listen live!
Show Archives (including show summaries) from Apr 1, 2013. Previous show archives (without show summaries here).
Important note to visitors. Blogger has changed the HTML code used when this blog was originally created. What that means is that some pictures may not load, or pictures have disappeared from original linking URL's and are no longer available. Fixing any picture requires an entire reload of all pictures so that the pictures work with HTTPS, or Blogger will not allow any in story photo updates. Pages are currently being updates (freshened up). Be patient as pages get updated. Updates are based on various page use/visit priorities.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Inside the Eye has been outfitted with a new banner, shown above.
This interview was conducted on May 14, 2011. Some audio editing had to be done to bring Alex's voice up and, having crashed my audio editing program, a few days were required to find and learn a new program.
In the initial show, we delve into the earlier days of the Celtic Rebel and some of his earlier works. He discusses the layers programming used to target mass audiences. We got through 3 of 6 layers and then realized that after 3 years, the layers of social engineering in film was readily available to 3 levels. The 4th layer, the ritual act of revealing, was a pretty interesting insight.
Listen to this entertaining segment here:
Segment 2 - The Human Star Gate
Segment 2 picked up nicely from Segment 1 and discussed further a macro observation of social engineering through the media. We then discussed The Celtic Rebel's idea of an internal star gate, which he regards as the human digestive system as a template for what is a star gate and migrated to an observation of the fallacy of "free will".
We then had an interesting conversation regarding the ignorant watch dogs (trolls) that are employed to create an aura of intolerance to the dispensing of ideas in social conversation.
The segment is informative and gives a unique perspective by two veterans contributors of the early development and use of the web to advance new ideas and perspectives. The audio can be listened to here:
Segment 3 - Don't Go West - Banned
To complete the interview, we discussed the issues of neurolinguistic programming and how the documentary of the Celtic Rebel, "Don't Go West", revealed key core codes in the subliminal programing of the pederast priest craft, which we regards as Talmudic in origin and continued expression.
We discussed the idea of a hidden elite utilizing media assets to program individuals for the express purpose of turning individuals into something they would not normally be, and the perpetuation of a "gay agenda" hidden into film and mass media.
Ultimately, we discuss the idea the "Solomon's Key" is really a cipher for sodomy as a means to a shortcut to "eternal life", which the Celtic Rebel referred to as "the vampyric shortcut". This segment is a must listen - a fascinating discussion into the sordid reality of Jewish or Talmudic metaphysics.
Segment 3 can be heard here:
You can check out the Celtic Rebel's documentary on called "Don't Go West" here.
Hope everyone enjoys the show. Aside from the editing, it was a lot of fun to do and informative too. Let us know how you like the new format.
Posted by Dennis Fetcho at 2:50 PM
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Son of Hipponicus, there is an ancient saying, that "hard
is the knowledge of the good." And the knowledge of names is a great
part of knowledge. - Socrates, from Cratylus
One might peer into the irrationality of the war on Nature by certain corporate and cultural interests, but the seeming irrationality of the assault on Nature has a darker, occult - well nature.
In this article, we will peer into the Occult nature of names and Nature.
The Mystical "Naming of Names"
The "naming of Names" is a process that is deeply rooted in Qaballistic lore and practice. From Cratylus in the Greek Classics, we find a whole play (argument) regarding the nature of the naming of Names. Cratylus held that names could not be arbitrarily given for the Name belongs "naturally" to their specific objects. The Greeks understood this process to be the domain of "the legislator":
Soc. Then the teacher, when he gives us a name, uses the work of the
Her. I agree.
Soc. And is every man a legislator, or the skilled only?
Her. The skilled only.
Soc. Then, Hermogenes, not every man is able to give a name, but only
a maker of names; and this is the legislator, who of all skilled artisans
in the world is the rarest.
The Greeks understood that they could not identify the source of the "names" for which they used within the natural usage of their language:
Soc. And when the teacher uses the name, whose work will he be using?
Her. There again I am puzzled.
Soc. Cannot you at least say who gives us the names which we use?
Her. Indeed I cannot.
Most importantly, names had to fit their essence:
Soc. Then, Hermogenes, I should say that this giving of names can
be no such light matter as you fancy, or the work of light or chance
persons; and Cratylus is right in saying that things have names by
nature, and that not every man is an artificer of names, but he only
who looks to the name which each thing by nature has, and is able
to express the true forms of things in letters and syllables.
The name which each thing has by its very nature is the very fusing the name to Nature, for Nature is the provider of the "nature of the thing".
Between "Conventionalism" and "Naturalism"
Our linguistic esoteric roots essentially begin with Cratylus. Within Cratylus is advanced two theories relative to word formation: "Naturalism" and "Conventionalism". Each of these methodologies must be considered and factored into any esoteric deconstruction of the language, for reasons which will be demonstrated.
Within the idea of "Naturalism", there is a recognition that words that describe a thing must, by their very nature, accurately reflect and describe "the thing". Within Cratylus, we learn that there were two agents responsible for this process: the "legislator" and "the dialectician". The "legislator" was akin to the actual "name giver", and it was the role of the legislator to ponder upon the object/thing, and, utilizing the tools available - the repository of syllables, effect the proper naming of the "thing".
The "dialectician" was an independent arbiter - a "quality control agent" and "directo" co-equally, as it were.
Soc. And the work of the legislator is to give names, and the dialectician must be his director if the names are to be rightly given?
Her. That is true.
Soc. Then, Hermogenes, I should say that this giving of names can be no such light matter as you fancy, or the work of light or chance persons; and Cratylus is right in saying that things have names by nature, and that not every man is an artificer of names, but he only who looks to the name which each thing by nature has, and is able to express the true forms of things in letters and syllables.
With this in mind, we recognize that words have various constructions, from the primary to the complex. Complex names may be analyzed through the complexity of the syllables. In basic terms, such syllables as "prefixes" and "suffixes" and "roots" form the core of the whole. In general, reductions of "complex names" may entail a reduction of a word to its "root", or reductions may actually expand into entire phrases. Whether the reduction is reflected as a primary word, or even a letter, or the reduction is an expansion into a whole phrase or description, remains variants to be explored by the "reader", or the one charged with the decoding of any given word or sound.
Although complex names may reduce into the form of an expansion, complex names too may be reduced to primary names. Once a name has reached a primary condition, the primary condition may not extend into expanded or complex names. Primary names may only reduce further into single syllables, which are often roots, or they will reduce further down to single letters. Single letters, being syllabic in nature, may prove and often will, form the very singular root of a word. This condition necessitates that letters themselves, being symbolic, must too be imitative of some principle or concept found in "Nature".
Ultimately, within this vein of linguistic thinking, the connection of a word to its "thing" follows a natural process that ultimately may be defined or reduced to single or letter pairings, wherein each sound is in most instances or probabilities representative of multiple imitative significances.
Apart from this naturalist approach to word formation remains the "constructive approach". Within a "constructive" approach, names are not primarily derived through naturalist methods, but rather by "Convention". Word creation and development through "Convention" implies a cultural approach, a "creation by committee" vein of reasoning.
Hence in English, we infer the feminine to be "woman", but in Spanish, culturally, a decision somewhere was made that this same name would be "muchacha". On an expanded scale, "convention" implies a cultural agreement as to the meanings and properties of words and sounds as they are reduced to the syllabic, or letter values.
Another way to view this is through an analysis of "number names". Since there is an infinite number of numbers, particular rules have been formed upon which the name of numbers may be written or said. In this way, we end all "ten" counts with the letter "T", as in "twenty", "thirty", "forty", etc., while equally, words are ordered to denote the concept or thing. Through convention - cultural agreement - we say, "two hundred and seventy six". We do not say, for instance, "seventy and six plus two hundred".
Cultural, through "convention", it may be seen and proven that word structures exist that follow particular patterns and rules to their formations.
Conventionalism may, then, be further implied to include a rational construction to words (as is found in scientific terms). This being the case, the same rational constructions would need to be factored into word creation when the very name or word appears to be a purely random, or naturalist, generated event or occurance.
A Qaballistic View of Words
From a Qaballistic point of view, it is illogical and impractical to weight one form of linguistic reasoning over the other. It is prudent to weigh "naturalism" and "conventionalism" with near comparable weight. It is my preference to weigh slightly on the side of "naturalism" owing to the fact that the substrates upon which we work, the Letters, defy a purely constructive or conventionalist logic.
There remains esoteric properties for which conventionalism cannot fully encompass, explain, or integrate.
From a very basic analysis, we know that words, phrases, and even whole thoughts and ideas, be they simple or extended to that of a printed work or book, represent upon utterance or setting down to letter form, some thought or concept held within the mind of another. Words, ultimately, are "frozen thoughts" which, depending upon the circumstances of their utterance or reception, have power to resonate across space and time
Words and names were at one time assigned by one of our earlier ancestors, with much of the core of the language assigned by ancestors long before the advent of the written word.
These original "name makers" affixed to the names certain descriptive properties that is representative of the object. The names serve as beacons of this earlier thought and may or may not be wholly representative of the object. There may be errors in the original calculations of the name giver.
These names have, essentially, survived to their present day. These names have undergone one of two expected permutations: a corruption of the sound sets over time or, a refinement of the sound sets over time. In addition, it is expected that, as language is a process of growth, original sound sets are to be found in expansions of words. These expansions further build upon the original intent of the name giver.F
Whether names have undergone corruptions, refinements, or expansions, the end goal of the Qaballist is to ascertain the original intended messages. This ability is, generally speaking, an esoteric art and takes special abilities.
Soc. And what is the nature of this truth or correctness of names? That, if you care to know, is the next question.
Her. Certainly, I care to know.
Soc. Then reflect.
Her. How shall I reflect?
Soc. The true way is to have the assistance of those who know, and you must pay them well both in money and in thanks; these are the Sophists,
Within the Qaballistic traditions remain what is known as "an oral tradition". Much of this idea of an "oral tradition" is put forward with pomp and circumstance relative to Rabbinical Kabballah.
However, we know that the "oral traditions" were the primary means of knowledge preservation across the planet, be their the Rishis of India, the Kalevala of the Finns, or the Prose Edda of the Teuton German tribes. Indeed, Western esoteric traditions are replete in oral tradition lore and this may be inferred in such institutions as Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Hermeticism, and more.
As words are at the very core of the oral traditions, it can be further inferred that words themselves carry with them oral analysis and properties not necessarily found within any given written treatise as say, a dictionary.
So when we begin our journey into Qaballistic deconstructions, we must keep all these ideas and principles in mind and doing so, we may begin to effect proper and rational Qaballistic deconstructions.
For example, in the phrase, the "birds and the bees", we may reduce this statement to its primary letters.
BIRDS = BR'D
BEES = B
Ultimately, the sound set, being rooted in letters, is descriptive of the Letter B and R. B is the profile of a pregnant woman while R is the profile of a woman. In the sequence BR, the R is said to be "the breaking of the water", wherein BR is the descriptive element and "aching" being the complex addition to the root sequence of BR. BR-ACH-ING as "breaking" provides us with multiple Qaballistic channels of interpretation.
BR is the process of BIRTH itself. ACH is H is the creation of a new life, fused to the sound set of EAKING. From here, multiple channels of thought may be allowed to enter.
Returning to the BIRDS and the BEES, we are reminded that this is too fused allegorically to an explanation of "sex". IN the case of the BIRDS, we have the very outward expression of the "fertilized egg" resting opening in a nest for all to see. The work of the male and the female may be openly observed.
In the case of the BEES, we have the work of the bee as the "pollenizer", or the ability of the male part of plant to fertilize or pollenize the female part of a plant. Here again, words demonstrate reductions into letter significations, wherein P is the male significator and O is the female significator.
PO(LLEN), then, proves to be a complex formation set against the principles of male and female in letter form representation (PO).
In each case, we find the words that are used to describe the thing or action are accurately, whether the process was through naturalism or conventionalism, describing the nature of the thing being named.
Such is the way in which Qaballistic reasoning may be and is employed.
Posted by Dennis Fetcho at 3:05 PM
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Pi was the great unknown, a number which accurately reflects the nature of "That which Is" for it may be known, it may never be known - its digits extending out to infinity in an endless stream of non-repeating digits, yet forming a rational representation within the first 32 digits in what is otherwise a wholly irrational number.
Setianist (Monotheism) force sought (and continues to seek) to destroy this ancient knowledge. However, as the knowledge is fused to the solar calendar, a 26 digit Alphabet, and the Great Constant of Pi, such erasures of knowledge are nearly impossible: the knowledge may be forgotten or denied, but can never truly be erased.
This article will reflect precisely how this ancient knowledge was caste into the great Pagan holiday of Beltaine.
The Traditional Holiday of Beltaine
The Pagan calendar is/was divided into 8 "sabbats", 4 of which are considered "minor" and 4 of which are considered "major". Beltaine is considered to one of the major. All of the major sabbats are constructed so as to represent Pi. In the case of Beltaine, this day is traditionally caste on May 1. May 1 is 121st day of the year, or a number which is 11*11. 11*11 is a number representative of the Great Circle of Life. Additional information regarding the number 11:11 may be found in the article here at the Illuminatus Observor entitled The Master Number (11:11) and the World of Sport.
Beltaine is known as "the sex sabbat". The entire of the rituals surround Beltaine are centered on the fertility and fecundity of the Earth. The mythological representation of Beltaine is linked to the Spring and the forward thoughts of "harvest". Beltaine is a celebration of life, of the conquering of light and life over death and darkness.
Its names are many, including Walpurgishnacht and Roodmas, Roodmas being an earlier form for the name of the Jehovian church and for which was one of the earlier attempts to erase the impact of the festival in the hearts and minds of the people through essentially inverting the symbolism of life to that of the cross and death.
Ritual practices varied from region to region throughout Northern Europe. In Ireland, a common ritual was to light "balefires", in honor of the horned god Bal. As a purification ritual, it was common to jump over the bale fires, often without clothes. The nursery rhyme:
"Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack jumped over the candlestick!"
The day was also know for other forms of fire rituals, often centered around sexual themes.
Of course, the most widely recognized Beltaine ritual remains the Maypole.
The timing of May Day is regarded as one of the solar "power points", and its encoding is clearly defined within the Isisian Codes, to be expanded upon later.
Efforts to Eradicate Beltaine
But you who forsake the Lord,
who forget my holy mountain,
who set a table for Fortune
and fill cups of mixed wine for Destiny,
12 I will destine you to the sword,
and all of you shall bow down to the slaughter,
because, when I called, you did not answer;
when I spoke, you did not listen,
but you did what was evil in my eyes
and chose what I did not delight in.”
Clearly this is a passage written by a psychopath, not much different from the leadership found in Israel today, and, to a larger degree, elites within Western systems who have forsaken Western ideals and subjected same to Jewish ideological thinking.
Hence with the rise of Christianity, rooted as it was in Judaism, we find movements dedicated to the slaughter of things that were not acceptable to the purported "moralistic" thinking inspired by interpretations of Jewish religious thinking. What was "Pagan" was to be destroyed. What could not be destroyed was to be integrated such that the original meanings, to the extent possible, would be forever forgotten.
This was the game plan. Says Torah so clearly, again from Isaiah 65,
“For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth,and the former things shall not be remembered or come into mind."
Such words are not the words of a religion, rather, they are the words of a political agenda fused to a religion system based on the ways of the psychopath. Who in their right mind would worship and find value in the words of slaughtering others under some pretense of doing what is not desired by oneself?
Hence the Pagan Calendar was put to the run, chased by the political forces hiding within the Church. Easter was changed to some absurd idea of a risen dead guy on a cross, a concept totally ripped and plagiarized from earlier risen god mythologies. The "feminine" or "Goddess" Aester/Ishtar, etc., would be forgotten. New earths were being created.
PASSOVER in the Jewish traditions and "the CROSS" in the Christian traditions could be seen as two systems being fused together, the very words hinting that each would share in half of the esoteric formulations.
Christmas would also be changed to fit a wholly Jewish based mythology, and the other major and minor Sabbats of the Pagans would find themselves being changed. IMBOLC, traditionally celebrated on Feb 1/2, would be changed to "Ground Hogs Day", for instance. A new Earth - the elimination of knowledge from the past, was indeed the New World Order of the day.
Beltaine, as May Day, would be no exception.
The Roman Catholic Church, in its lust for blood and destruction, had a difficult time stamping out the May Day festivals. In one such effort, the name was changed to Roodmas. Rood, meaning "cross", was the earlier name for the Church in German territory. One must wonder whether the English term of "rude", meaning to be of ill manner and over bearing demeanor is itself not a simple code word for the earlier name of "Rood" as it applied to the autocratic, obnoxious, and tyrannical nature of the Church.
Surprisingly, it was not the Church that had the majority of success in curtailing and nearly eradicating the celebrations surrounding Beltaine, but rather its successor, the Protestant movements. When Puritans (the same people behind the prudish side of American sexual morality) came to power in England, they were so horrified by the popularity and "debauchary" of Beltaine that in 1644, they made the celebration of the holiday "illegal" through the banning of many of the rituals,
May Day festivities became so much fun that in 1644 the Puritans attempted to make the celebrations illegal, banning even the making of Maypoles. They especially attempted to suppress the 'greenwood marriages' of young men and women who spent the entire night in the forest, staying out to greet the sunrise, and bringing back boughs of flowers and garlands to decorate the village the next morning. One angry Puritan wrote, 'men doe use commonly to runne into woodes in the night time, amongst maidens, to set bowes, in so muche, as I have hearde of tenne maidens whiche went to set May, and nine of them came home with childe.' And another Puritan complained that, of the girls who go into the woods, 'not the least one of them comes home again a virgin.'
In Communist Russia, where the Communist leadership banned Christian religious expression, May Day was elevated to one of the more important rituals within the Communist political religion. The purpose, of course, was to metaphysically take advantage of the solar energy of the day, but equally to fuse to the day a new meaning wholly unrelated to the original intent and purpose.
The success of these efforts has resulted in a global usage of May 1 as a day for labor activism. Aside from the more focused of groups in the Northern Hemisphere, where Beltaine celebrations now may be widely found, the day has lost much of its symbolic significance and ritual meaning.
Indeed, a new Earth has been crafted and the former ways have been largely forgotten.
Such is the way of Setianist/Jewish political influence on traditional Earth/Solar/Pagan based religious thought.
Posted by Dennis Fetcho at 4:18 PM