Upcoming Guests on Inside the Eye - Live!

Visit Inside the Eye - Live!, the new website for Inside the Eye - Live! radio show with The Fetch!

Show starts at 10:00am Eastern Call in or listen live!

Show Archives (including show summaries) from Apr 1, 2013. Previous show archives (without show summaries here).

Important note to visitors. Blogger has changed the HTML code used when this blog was originally created. What that means is that some pictures may not load, or pictures have disappeared from original linking URL's and are no longer available. Fixing any picture requires an entire reload of all pictures so that the pictures work with HTTPS, or Blogger will not allow any in story photo updates. Pages are currently being updated (freshened up). Be patient as pages get updated. Updates are based on various page use/visit priorities.


Thursday, September 2, 2021

"In the Beginning was the Word"


I was pleased to be able to make an appearance on Jody Kay's live stream on Tuesday, August 31, 2021.  To say that we were a bit rusty in presenting the information would be an understatement, but all in all, we ended up with a 2 + hours worth of content video that meandered through some insightful information.  Without visual aids, the effort will require a go through more than once.

Pencil and paper will help.

It was really good to get back to doing something in the Isisian Codes/Illuminatus Observor vein and for those who come and visit here from time to time, have a watch and enjoy.











Tuesday, April 28, 2020

S and R and the Verb "To Be'

I have been teaching English in military and academic institutions for nearly a decade, often subtlety incorporating knowledge contained within this body of work into helping students understand how the English language works. 

As my clients are Arabic speakers who are generally professionals with limited time to learn, I have sought out ever more efficient means of transmission of knowledge to aid in understanding the mechanics of English and how to apply this basic understanding to more rapidly grasp the language

When we speak about "mechanics" of English, we are generally referring to "grammar", or the general rules of the language.  One of the basic elements of grammar is verb conjugation and in English, arguably the most important verb is the verb "to be".  Although this may sound simple, Arabic as a language does not have a present form of the verb "to be", so even this seemingly most simple of expressions often takes time to grasp and understand.

However, the verb "to be" does exist in the past tense in Arabic and, like English, appears in an irregular conjugated form.  But unlike English, where the design is rather simple and elegant, the complexity of Arabic verb conjugations provides fertile ground to demonstrate the "gated logic" of English.

A rather fun exercise is to work with students and have them break down the Arabic verb "to be" in a class setting.  Since Arabic has 12 different forms of the verb "to be" in the past, one can imagine the time it takes to run through all of them, especially when you create the setting wherein students are  in a position of  "teaching the teacher".

In this setting, one can begin with the pronoun "I".  A simply demonstration begins first in the present tense:

"I am tired" = Ana taban

In this example, it is understood that "I am tired", but what is said is simply in Arabic is, "I tired".
Such sets the stage.  From here we ask how to say this in the past tense and do not raise or explain at this time the issue of how it actually works in English.

We begin with the pronoun "I".

Ana kuntu taban.

Simple enough.  We then move to the pronoun "you".  In this case, Arabic conjugations, much like Spanish, are gender specific.  Hence the pronoun must split into two forms and the verb "to be" equally must split into two forms.

m: Anta kunta taban
f: Anti kunti taban

At this stage of the demonstration, things are relatively simple and there is little confusion.
Since Arabic is gender specific, we already know that additional layers of complexity are required to express such things as "he" and "she", and indeed it does.  We then learn that:
m: howa kana = he was
f: hiya kanat - she was

Now, Arabic has changed the first vowel from a "u"  as found in the use with the pronoun "you" to an "a" and then requires an addition of the letter "t" at the end of the form to signify feminine.

We then move on the pronoun "it".

In Arabic, there is no pronoun for "it" and so a little fun can be had about chiding everyone as to where "it" went?  Moving to "we"

Nahnoo kunna

At this stage, the "trap", as it were, is set, because the purpose to the exercise is to show the "gated logic" of English.

In Arabic, one will need to go through 4 additional forms of "they" plus 2 additional forms of "you".  It all gets sorta confusing.  After trying to get the class to agree on any two forms of these two (usually they can't), you simply throw your hands up in the air, start erasing the board, and tell them that this is taking way too long and exclaim, "English is far simpler and you only have to know two letters.  S and R!"

And here is how it works!


The verb "to be" is unique in that its conjugation can be shown to be comprised of just two letters that are equally words.

B = be
R = are











The Isisian Codes (cipher) reveals that both B and R are essentially the same when put onto a mathematical matrix.  Each letter is placed at position 2.  The letter B is the glyph for "latent life" as represented by a pregnant woman (make the bottom bigger than the top) while the letter R is "manifested life".  Hence "being" is all about the philosophical constructions built into the very letters B and R.

One cannot B until they R.

If one ponders this philosophically, the letter R is really, in and of itself, a "past tense form" of the letter B.  In this way we begin to see the gated nature of the language on a higher, philosophical nature.  By "gated", we simply refer to that of a logic switch of a computer, which is binary in nature and represented by either 0 or 1.

Since English is gated, the language is simply turning "on" or "off", very much akin to a "toggle switch".  Digressing, the word "toggle" is generally referred to a switch that is either "up" (on) or "down" (off).  The word, being comprised of the TGL (the L being the fallen T), reminds of the observation of the sun as it goes from Winter Solstice (T), through (G-center) to Summer Solstice T, and then back down through G to T.

The sun appears to be going "up" or "down" - it TGL's ever bit as much as a (T)eeter (T)otter...

Returning to the mechanical function of English (grammar), we now can see that the verb To Be and its subsequent conjugation, ARE, is logically and philosophically connected.  The verb and its conjugation is intrinsically linked in cipher, inseparable.

The purpose of this exercise was, however, to demonstrate the simplicity (gated logic) of English as compared to an exceedingly complex gender system as Arabic.  This is easy to demonstrate because when it comes to English, English only cares about two issues: singular or plural.

In other words, it is gated.  If single, then this (0), if plural, then that (1). 

If the subject is "singular", we simply add an "S", which becomes the word "is", while if the subject is plural, we shift one letter to the left and us the letter R, or the word "are".

Obviously, when speaking, vocalizing the letter R or the word "are" is indistinguishable.

When applying this principle into the "past tense", the basic gate of S and R remains.  The language simply is adding a "W" to signify past tense.

Present singular "S" (is) becomes WS (was).
Present plural "R" (are) becomes WR (were).

Moving from past to present does not negate the base gate of S's and R's.

Furthere, English is not only "switching" on and off depending on either "1" or "2", but is linked in philosophical design.  The B and the R is latent and manifested life, respective.  However, while B represents 2 (mother with child), the R represents the "past tense of B", or the process of giving "BRth".  At this stage, the R is intrinsically still 2 as the newborn child remains, for all manner and intent, connected to the mother.

Hence the logic of R being "2", or "plural" is in and of itself wholly logical in both design and function.

It is not until the child grows and matures and is able to venture out on one's own that the "R" shifts to being the singular "S", or the next letter in the sequence of the Alphabet.

In this way, we can teach not only practical mechanical properties of the Alphabet, but we can also begin laying the foundation that reveals that Nature is inherently fused within the English Alphabet.

Saturday, April 6, 2019

G-d, 280, and Life vs Anti-Life


In casual conversation with an acquaintance, he stated rather astutely, "Judaism is a death-cult". In  very real way, such a statement rings of profound truths.  Henry Makow, himself Jewish, commented much to the same on a recent interview on Inside the Eye - Live!.  But I hold that what lies behind Judaism is not a "death cult", but more accurately an "anti-life" force, something that represents a complete void of all life.

Surely something as sinister as this exists?

Why else this seeming war on humanity, and even the planet itself?  Geo-engineering (chemtrails), genetically modified foods that prove to be harmful to living organisms, the proliferation of industry at the expense of environmental concerns are but a few.  We live in a "pack" age, or perhaps we are part of a "pack" age, where our very existence requires the movement of goods to be packaged, and as a result, something always remains behind that for lack of a better terms, becomes "garbage" and "refuse".

Never mind that language, properly crafted, reveals and conceals concurrently.  A "garb" is a covering, an outward appearance.  Or, a garb can be used to mask intentions.  Either way, a garb is that which presents itself on the outside, covering for what is on the inside.  Thus in the word "garbage", we find too that we live in a "garb age", where even the human form hides the inner essence of what the real nature of the spirit residing within.

In the word "REFUSE", with an accent on the first syllable, we have  a noun akin to "trash", but if we shift the accent to the second syllable, we have a verb akin to "not accept".  Hence "REFUSE" and "TO REFUSE" are essentially the same, for what is "garbage" is precisely what has been "refused".

Technically speaking, REFUSE is comprised of "GARBAGE" and "RUBBISH".  Since GARBAGE is essentially "biodegradable" such as "food stuffs", we can argue now that food itself is a "GARB" that covers the inner essence, and even spiritual nature, of the food in question, while "RUBBISH" is that which is inanimate, as glass, wood, paper products etc.  Hence one can "rub", or touch that which has become "rubbish", with the "ish" reminding us that what remains is in a "sorta state".  After all, what you would otherwise "rub" is, too, refused, and hence is "rubbish".

All of this is, of course, a digression.

Judaism as an Anti-Life Force - Ancient Records to Contemporary Times



Such a title sounds like the makings of a book, and indeed, to the ambitious out there, such a book could easily be found.  However, we begin this story with the Epic of Gilgamesh.  In this tale, the god Enlil brings on the Deluge in an effort to destroy all life on Earth.

From Tablet XI, we read,
Just then Enlil arrived. He saw the boat and became furious, he was filled with rage at the Igigi gods: 'Where did a living being escape? No man was to survive the annihilation!' - source
What clearer words do you need?  The "god" that brought on "Flood" or "Deluge", who would later go on to become the "god of the Jews" sought to bring about an "annhilation", a complete void life.  It does not get any more explicit than that, but what would follow would be a trail of tears befitting the phonetic root of the word "Torah" - tears, terror, rot.

Jews as a people have been a murderous lot from the time of their "escape" from Egypt, if indeed their tales are to be believed.  Worse, they take divine inspiration to murder and do so without human remorse or apology and have done so since they first burst on to the historical scene.

The LORD our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people. And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain. Deuteronomy 2:33-34
These are not a people you can "reason with", for at the core of their spiritual essence is a belief that they are commanded to murder and destroy,

And thou shalt consume all the people which the LORD thy God shall deliver thee; thine eye shall have no pity upon them. Deuteronomy 7:16
Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword. Deuteronomy 13:15

But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth. Deuteronomy 20:16-17

Nothing that breatheth.  Not just a death-cult, but an anti-Life cult.

From the organized slaughter and plunder of Russia to the more subtle, but not so hidden plunder and destruction of the United States today, where Jews are found is found a trail of tears.  What was "Communist Russia" was really not "Russia", but more accurately "Judaism".

In 1935, the most famous rabbi in America, Rabbi Stephen Wise, one so powerful and prestigious that he hung out, so to speak, with President Roosevelt, boldly stated,
“Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” (The American Bulletin, May 5,1935) - source
Make no mistake about what is before us today.  Cultural Marxism, "feminism", the globo-homo agenda, vaccines, and much more are all rooted in the subversive anti-Life force that lies at the heart of Judaism and for all its proclamations, only cognitive dissonance prevents people from peering into the face of what could be viewed as a literal evil.

Conceptual Representations of Duality 




One must build one's Qaballistic knowledge from a word to a word, from a concept to a concept such that one is able to glimpse into an apperception of the conceptual, that lightning flash of inspiration that lights up the night sky, allows you to see what surrounds you before you are immersed again into utter darkness while whipped by storms that brew all around you.

In the Letters F and V, we have discussed in detail the DREIDLE as a 3 dimensional prop that hides underlying Qabbalistic knowledge that hearkens all the way back to the tale of the Garden of Eden and the Flaming Sword and Cherub.  The Letter F is the top of the dreidle, while the Letter V is the tip of the dreidle.

The Letter V in this conceptual representation represents "death".  It is the Hebrew Letter VAV (ו)

The numerical equivalent of the vav is six. Six represents connection, exemplified by the angels in Ezekiel’s vision, whose six wings enabled them to soar to unite and connect with G‑d. - source
Never mind the utter obvious, that the Letter VaV screams of the Letter V.  The tale of the Ka rising up to join the gods, or of angels taking the dead away to be with "God" or "Jesus", are all embed into this transpositional tale that provides the garb for the letter vav (ו), states of existence that are brought about following one's death.

That we bury people six feet under acutely reminds us that "6" is intricately linked to death.

On the other side of the dreidle is a square, which is at the top of the dreidle.  The square is the swastika, itself comprised of 4 F's, representing LIFE in that 6*6*6*6 = 1296, or the Letter LIF(e).

This is a conceptual that presents us with a representation of duality.  One side, or end point, represents the polar opposite of the other.

This conceptual representation of duality can be viewed in the 6 and its sum, 21, but I will leave that for you to contemplate and discern on your own.

G-d, 280, and LIFE



Symbols, and thus Letters, hold within them numerous permutations of meaning.  "Meaning" must be interpreted in coordination with contextual clues.

Just as the dreidle encodes the duality of Life (FFFF) and Death (V), we can craft formulas in mathematics that present the same duality.  Perhaps it is written as thus: G-d (as Death) and 9! as Life.

It works as thus.

All life we can equate to the 9 numbers.  Traditionally, numbers are "summed", or added one on top of the other.  Thus we say that B is comprised of the 1 and the 3 as B is located at number 2 and the ∑1:2 = 3.

However, if we factorialize the 9 numbers, we could equate this to the TOP of the dreidle, or LIFE, while the removal of LIFE from this equation should equate to Jews and their "god", or G-d.  In the formula G-d, we have the 7 (G) and the 4 (d).  Traditionally, again, SUM the numbers:

G = 7; ∑1:7 = 28
D = 4; ∑1:4 = 10

28 X 10 = 280

Thus 280 is our NUMBER of DEATH, a sign of Jews and their "god".  The opposite of this (duality) should now be a process of "adding" LIFE,  through a process of multiplication.  LIFE is 1296 (6*6*6*6), and so 280 * 1296 = 362880.

Now we Factorialize the 9 digits, which means we multiple 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 = 362880.

In this way we can show that 9! = 362880 = LIFE and the conceptual opposite would be to divide by a series of 6's such that it can be divisible no more.  Such a process would appear as thus:

362880/6/6/6/6 = 280

Thus we show that G-d itself is a symbol for DEATH.

Seeing too that the formula G-d removes the "sacred feminine" via the Letter O, and we are left with a form of "globo-homo" representation such that cannot bring life and whose proliferation and acceptance can only bring annihilation and death.



Saturday, March 9, 2019

The Sepher Yetzirah - The Vowels

The sounds that comprise speech are paired into two categories: open and closed - the vowels and consonants, and the voice and unvoiced.

In the article article "The Sepher Yetzirah, Setting Number to Letter", we began a comprehensive understanding of sound as they are being set to number in English.   What we learned is that the unvoiced letters, the unaspirated, are set at precise locations in the Alphabet.  Counting forward, the numbers are 3,6 and 11.  The letters placed at 11, the K and X, share design similarities, while the X contains within it sounds from the C, K, and S.  The number 11 is unique in that it is -3 from the end of the half of the Alphabet.

Since each half of the Alphabet is 13 letters in length, counting in reverse, the 11(forward) is the 3rd letter in reverse.  We may say that the unvoiced, or the anaspirated, are intricately linked to the 3, while the Letter T, itself unvoiced, yet rarely invoked as being so, is placed at 4.  You may try to discern precisely why this is so should you care to "know theyself", but we will address this later.


In a manner of speaking, we begin to see a binary pattern forming.  We can place consonants, or the closed, as a 1, and the vowels, which are open, as a 0.  We can then divide the Alphabet in half which then reveals that the letters A and N would each be placed at the number 1.  A is open and N is closed.  Why is this of interest?  Because we begin to see a pattern of speech where the ARTICLES of speech, the words A, AN, and THE, are really working on a principle of opening and closing.

The OPEN letters, the Vowels, are A, E, I, O, and U.  If the noun starts with a vowel (open), we use the article that is closed (AN), thus creating a sequence of "closed-open" or "open-closed".  We ONLY use A and AN if the noun is a SINGLE unit, or 1, and of course, A and AN are both located at number 1.  If this sounds etheric, it is not.

There is A (OPEN) Bird (CLOSED) on the wall.  A is open, the letter B of Bird is closed.
There is AN ELEPHANT in the room.  The N of AN is CLOSED, while the E of Elephant is OPEN.

OPEN - CLOSED = 0 1
CLOSED - OPEN = 1 0

We may view the placement of the VOWELS in two distinct patterns:

1 -5 -9, ⅀ 1:5, and ⅀ 1:6.  These correspond to the Letters A, E, I, O, and U, respective.

In the first 9 digits (A - I), these can be reversed so that the I, placed at 9, is 1, equally, which is preserved well enough in the Roman numbering system.

Now we must make a philosophical, reasoned inquiry.

Is 10 simply another 0?  Actually, it is.  There are 9 digits plus 0.  If we then allow for the J of 10 to be another 0 start point, then the Letters O and U are actually set at 5 (0) and 1 (U).  Thus, if you set the Alphabet into a sets of 10, with the 0 being the start point, the 10 and 20 become 0's, the vowels then are set at essentially two logical places: 1 and 5, as the letter U would be 1 and the "sometimes vowel Y" would be set also at 5.

This would imply that the Letter Z would also be a 0 start point, for in reverse, the Z zero start point would, in reverse, make the Y a 1 and the U a 5.

The VOWELS, we may now surmise, just as the unvoiced letters which take the number placement 3, are set at precise integers, namely the 1 and the 5,with the 9 taken also by the letter I, which is itself 1.

Once the Alphabet is placed into its PHONETIC matrix, which I termed "The Isisian Codes", we now see that the vowels indeed fall back into these exact number patterns, equally.

The Letter U, which could be said to have a value of 1, is always paired with the Letter Q, which is, itself, placed at location number 1.  The Letter U also returns back to the placement of Number 5, while the letter Y, which would have 1 start point if we allow for a ZERO Z start point, is placed with the Letter I, which itself is a number 1 and 9 equally.

The Letter Z disappears.  It is ZERO.  Perhaps the word ZERO is telling us that Z is R(our) 0.

The Letter O and U become co-relative viewed letters relative to number in that ⅀ 1:5 is 15, the placement of the Letter O, which then may be viewed as its co-relative 5 within the formula ⅀ 1:5.  Even if we were to write the formula as ⅀ 1:O, which would then be ⅀ 1:O (15), the total comes to 105.

No matter.  If we hand the number 15 to a "numerologist",, they will add 1+5 and arrive at 6, the letters placement in the Isisian Codes.  If we provide them with the number 105, they will still arrive at 6, even as it is ⅀ 1:5.

Equally, the Letter U placed at 21 (⅀ 1:6), but if we were to use the formula ⅀ 1:U (21), the value is 231.  We can then give this to a "numerologist", who will add the digits 2+3+1 and return it back to a 6, but as we see above, using Z as a start (O) point, the Letter U returns back to 5.

If we say the word THE, the E takes on the sound of the Letter U, as in UNDER, it takes on the value of 5, or E, while if we use the Letter U as a long vowel (its name U), as in UNION, the sound takes on the Letter Y as to say younion, which then is either a 1 in reverse using the Letter Z as a ZERO START POINT, or a 5, if we use the 20 as a ZERO START POINT.

Again.  No matter.  We have shown that the vowels are NOT randomly placed, but placed, as the unvoiced or unaspirated letters, at precise mathematical points in the Alphabet.


Monday, February 4, 2019

The Sepher Yetzirah - Setting Number to Letter


As discussed in the article "The Sepher Yetzirah - A Pseudo-linguistic Treatise", the Sepher Yetzirah clearly lays out that early Occultists were engaged in a study of the linguistic properties of language and how sounds and their accompanying letter representations  demonstrate models of hardness and softness (voiced and unvoiced), contain in many cases multiple sounds, or are paired to form hard and soft variations of the same sound.

In this article, we will discuss the fusion of letter to number and how this was done within the English Alphabet.

Modern usage of Letters as Numbers often to do not incorporate the idea of sound, or phonetics,  as being an integral component of the Alphabet.  However, the Devanagari script of the Hindi indeed includes such a construction.  When applied to Gematria, the Devanagari script assigns number to each syllable.  Thus a consonant and its accompanying vowel receives a specific digit.
It is interesting to observe that ancient Indian Mathematicians preferred Devanagari alphabet to numerals in representing large numbers. They used a code language to represent the digits of the numbers. This, they did, not for secrecy but to facilitate memorizing. They encoded numbers in the form of sutras or verses which made them easy to be memorized even for small children. - source
This cipher is known as the "Aryabhata Code" 

When applying this code to the A Hymn to Agni

As the Indian author Jain as revealed, Sanskrit is a multi-layered mathematical coding system.
As he explains it,
Similar to numerology, by ascribing the values of numbers to consonant letters as in A = 1, B = 2, C = 3, D = 4, but in Sanskrit, the Vedic Numerical Code was so sophisticated that it possessed 3 layers and therefore triple meanings.
It turns out that decimal form of the transcendental number:
Pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832792 etc was hidden or codified in these following syllables, by chanting: "Gopi Bhagyamaduv rata Shringishodadi Sandiga Kala Jeevitarava Tava Galaddhalara Sangara" (Observing the top line, "go" = 3, "pi" = 1, "bha = 4, "ya" = 1, "ma" = 5, "dhu" = 9, "ra" =2, "ta" = 6 etc giving the first 8 figures of Pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter). Not only did it give Pi to 32 decimal places, but there was a secret Master Key within the patterning of the 32 that could unlock the next 32 decimals of Pi, and so on, a ticket to infinity. Not only did it praise Krishna, it operated on another level as a dedication to Shankara: (800A.D, the celebrated Acharya or Teacher, and founder of 4 monastic orders. - source
So, although within our Western traditions, we generally credit Pythagoras and the Greeks for the establishing a philosophical foundation where numbers were fused to sound, it is generally understood by Eastern scholars that Sanskrit was well versed in this practice and hence predates the use of Letter/Number/Sound as was done in the West.

The Greek Letter Number System 



 Precisely how Pythagoras, one of the most influential mathematician-philosophers of Western civilization, was inspired to put forward his treatise on Number is not precisely known, but rumors and stories about about Pythagoras being born through divine intervention.  Pythagoras was said to have imparted knowledge through formulae contained in his name, and used the letters as esoteric tools to teach about philosophical wisdom.
The Letter Y, for instance, held the following significance, 
The famous Pythagorean Υ signified the power of choice and was used in the Mysteries as emblematic of the Forking of the Ways. The central stem separated into two parts, one branching to the right and the other to the left. The branch to the right was called Divine Wisdom and the one to the left Earthly Wisdom. Youth, personified by the candidate, walking the Path of Life, symbolized by the central stem of the Υ, reaches the point where the Path divides. The neophyte must then choose whether he will take the left-hand path and, following the dictates of his lower nature, enter upon a span of folly and thoughtlessness which will inevitably result in his undoing, or whether he will take the right-hand road and through integrity, industry, and sincerity ultimately regain union with the immortals in the superior spheres. 
It is probable that Pythagoras obtained his concept of the Υ from the Egyptians, who included in certain of their initiatory rituals a scene in which the candidate was confronted by two female figures. One of them, veiled with the white robes of the temple, urged the neophyte to enter into the halls of learning; the other, bedecked with jewels, symbolizing earthly treasures, and bearing in her hands a tray loaded with grapes (emblematic of false light), sought to lure him into the chambers of dissipation. This symbol is still preserved among the Tarot cards, where it is called The Forking of the Ways. The forked stick has been the symbol of life among many nations, and it was placed in the desert to indicate the presence of water. - source
Greek letters, additionally, were used as numbers, and so we see that from at least the time of Pythagoras, the Greeks were immersed into a study of a Letters as being comprised of Letters/Numbers/Sounds with philosophical archetypes already being affixed to the Letters

Plutarch, in his treatise, "On the Letter E at Delphi", for instance, would go on to add that the Letter E was/is the conjuction IF, and that the Letter E is the FIFth letter of the Alphabet, signifies a fusing of words to number and sound.

Ultimately, the Greek Letter/Number system would become the inspiration to the much later Jewish "letter/number" system.  Thus the Sepher Yetzirah is, in all probability, a leaked and Judaized document from the Pythagorean Mystery Schools.

The Roman Numbering System



Whereas Jewish mystics "forked"and adopted the Greek letter/number system, the Romans developed their own that would be intrinsically linked to the West, and especially to what would become the modern English language. Using but 7 letters, C-D-I-L-M-V-X to represent 100, 500, 1, 50, 1000, 5, and 10 respective. the Romans encoded a system whose constituent digits totaled 1,666, a number with enormous esoteric significance for it symbolized itself as a represented of the Sun.

Displayed in an array of 1-5-1-5-1-5-1, its reverse could be represented by a pairing formula, as C and D are congruent letters as are L and M.   Thus the digits (1+5)(1+5)(1+5)1 would reveal a 6661, the opposite representation of 1666.  And with the Sun being represented as a magical 6X6 grid where each horizontal row, vertical column, and diagonal row added to 111  Whereas the sum of 1:36 adds to 666, the Romans appeared eager to promote their understanding of Gematria numbers relative to the sun in a manner no civilization had yet so eloquently achieved.

The stage was set for a dynamic Gematria free from dogma and able to encode basic astronomical and philosophical concepts directly into language.

Gematria - Codes and Ciphers in the English and the Middle Ages


For those who doubt that English would have a Gematria foundation, one has to ask you: "Why would you think that?"

The idea of a Christian Cabala was extant and widely known the 1500's.  The recognized father of Western magic, Cornelius Agrippa, commented reasonably extensively on the subject.  Further, the Enlightenment saw the rise of "steganography", cryptology,  and with it, the willful and deliberate coding of information into documents austere and otherwise. To this day exist manuscripts whose secrets have yet to be revealed.

Truth is, very little academic attention has been given to the use of codes and ciphers in Medieval history, let alone any single language as English.  Yet clearly we know well that codes and ciphers in the language, "gematria", was well entrenched into the philosophical elite of the Middle Ages.
The codes and ciphers of the Middle Ages have received little or no modern scholarly attention. David Khan’s 1181-page volume _The Code-Breakers: The Comprehensive History of Secret Communication from Ancient Times to the Internet_, for example, devotes a mere thirty-four pages to the ancient and classical world, and little more than one sentence to the Middle Ages, claiming that “ciphers, of course, had been used by monks throughout the Middle Ages for scribal amusement” (106). But the construction and use of codes, ciphers, secret languages and mathematical secrets in the Middle Ages were much more than amusement: they were central to intellectual culture as modes of concealing dangerous, magical or secret information, and as a means of connecting oneself to the divine. - source 
To presume that English, the most prolific language for unique title/subject book releases from the middle 1600's to 1800, did not have within it, too, its own variant of encoding knowledge and secrets would more of a stretch than an implausible conspiracy.  Indeed, many have surmised, including Manley P. Hall and others, that the Shakespearean Plays held within them ciphers and hidden messages.





Not that such conjecture is a wild stretch.  After all, Sir Francis Bacon, the presumed ghost writer of the Shakespearean plays, created the "bi-lateral cipher", and acrostic ciphers, although somewhat subjective, appear to link Bacon directly to Shakespeare within the text of the plays themselves.


The Sepher Yetzira - Setting Number to Letters

What remains is precisely how we set number to letter within the English Alphabet.  The idea of an order and placement of the English Alphabet was lionized by Aleister Crowley, when he admonished his followers to find the order and value of the English of the English Alphabet in "The Book of the Law"
Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto.
Yet while Crowley's adherents chased and sought after "an order and value of the English Alphabet", what was equally implied, and in that time not yet fully comprehended or understood, was the implication that the English Alphabet already comprised a specific order and value as well as specific attributions.

Further, if Crowley and his followers were told to attribute "new symbols" to attribute to the English Alphabet, what precisely were these symbols and attributions extant within the English Alphabet?

After all, such an idea was never really solved, and a generation plus of occult oriented souls chased after Crowley's admonition while steadfastly ignoring the reality of what was before them: that the English Alphabet indeed contains order and esoteric attribution within the symbols.

All of this idea ultimately links back to the Sepher Yetzirah, which speaks about esoteric attributions to various letters.

What has always been lacking in the public discourse is a structural analysis of the English Alphabet utilizing "Qaballistic principles.  So let us proceed to explore the Order and Value of the English Alphabet and the underlying esoteric attributions contained within some of the Letters.

In order to accomplish, we should consider ideas the idea of aspirated and non-voiced sounds, as well as letters maintaining "double sounds", for all of this should then be observably placed back into some elegant cipher pattern that conceals these "mysteries" such that we may use the language to further encode esoteric formulae.

The Voiced and Non-Voiced Sounds


We should not presume that "the Creator" errors in precision and as such, that the Alphabet, whether divinely inspired (unconsciously placed into its present order), or crafted through logic and reason (language crafter's inspired by divine order), is in error.  Unlike Crowley, we start by presuming that the 26 digit system in place in English is in perfect order.

Thus, when we study the first linguistic principle from the Sepher Yetzirah, the idea of "voiced" and "unvoiced" sounds, we should find a harmony and precision that is unmistakable.

Indeed, simple observation shows that such is true.

The "unvoiced" sounds of English are all located a sequence based on 3.  Beginning at each half of the Alphabet, the un-voiced sounds may be found counted 3 in from the left start of each half of the Alphabet, then an additional 3 in from the previous unvoiced sound, and then 3 in from the start of the right side of each half of the Alphabet.

Here we may note that both K and X are as mirrors, each essentially symmetrical along the horizontal axis.  In the case of the Letter X, we attribute to the lower portion of the X the male aspect, and to the upper half of the Letter X (the V), the female aspect.  Thus the Letter X is the UNION of male and female, an idea that was, too, postulated too Dan Brown's "The Davinci Code".

When we add to our analysis the idea of "acroamatic ciphers" as espoused by Manley P. Hall, we can then begin the idea of assigning further attributions to the Letters.
The acroamatic cipher is the most subtle of all, for the parable or allegory is susceptible of several interpretations. Bible students for centuries have been confronted by this difficultly. They are satisfied with the moral interpretation of the parable and forget that each parable and allegory is capable of seven interpretations, of which the seventh--the highest--is complete and all-inclusive, whereas the other six (and lesser) interpretations are fragmentary, revealing but part of the mystery. The creation myths of the world are acroamatic cryptograms, and the deities of the various pantheons are only cryptic characters which, if properly understood, become the constituents of a divine alphabet. The initiated few comprehend the true nature of this alphabet, but the uninitiated many worship the letters of it as gods. - source
We now may equate the Letter X to the Tale of "Geb and Nut", with Geb, the god of the Earth in union with Nut, the goddess of the Sky.

However, as a "Number", the Letter X is the number 10, which too reveals both male (1) and female (0), while its location is at 11 of the second half of the Alphabet reveals that both 1 and 0 as male and female are too "1" in and of themselves, and thus the "unity" of the two I's as (11), crossing over each other create the Letter X.

Thus we may view the "X" as 10 or 11, but each number represents the same esoteric dynamic (attribution) which soon dissipates when seen as the "24".

The Letter K shares some of these same properties as the Letter X, but contains only half of the totality of the X as the vertical line divides the totality of the union (in design).  The Letter K, thus, we may equate to "being cut off", uniquely separate even as it shares the properties of the X.

The Letter K, as an attribution, we equate to the Egyptian "Ka", which is the higher spiritual self of the incarnated soul.  The vertical is as a mirror so as the self peers up into the heavens in search of its higher self, it sees but a reflection of what that higher self is.  The clearer (cleaner) the mirror, the clearer the vision of the spiritual self.

Interestingly enough, the Letter X, pronounced as it is as "ECKS", contains the unvoiced sounds as show, leaving only the F and the P (and T) as unvoiced sounds not incorporated into naming of the Letter "X".  Regardless, we know that the "3" and "11" have perhaps as yet unascertained links to the unaspirated, for if we are to reverse the numbers/letters to read from right to left, we will find still that the Letter C is linked at 11, while the P, although linked and purely masculine in attribute, fails to hold any phonetic links to such numbering.

Bringing the S into harmonic order (number) must rest upon an additional matrix within the Alphabet.


Wednesday, January 9, 2019

The Sepher Yetzirah - A Pseudo-Linguistic Treatise

The Sepher Yetzirah is a foundation document to the Qaballistic Arts  It is also one of the earliest occult documents that specifically references linguistic observations being embedded into esoteric constructions.


The primary proposition of the The Sepher Yetzirah is that language is predicated on 3 ciphers, or sepharim: letter, numbers, and sounds. Writing in the introduction to his work, "The Sepher Yetzirah", William Wescott shares,

Eliphas Levi, the famous French Occultist, thus wrote of the "Sepher Yetzirah" in his "Hisoire de la Magi, p 54:"The Zohar is a Genesis of the illumination, the Sepher Jezirah is a ladder formed of truths.  Therein are explained the thirty-two absolute signs of sounds, numbers and letters: each letter reproduces a number, an idea and a form; so that mathematics are capable of application to ideas and to form not less rigorous than to numbers, by exact proportion and perfect correspondence.
Letters are symbols for sounds, but are fused equally to number, form, archetype.  They are two dimensional representations of 3 + dimensional forms which are then combined to form words, and from words, sentences, and from sentences  we begin the process of exponential growth in reason and logic capable of creating "reality".  Whether that "reality" is fiction or truth, deception or lies matters little from the foundation of letters as representations of sounds.

Letters are akin to cloak, a robe.  In fact, in Plutarch's On Isis and Osiris, the letters are known as "the robes of Isis", while the "robe of Osiris is the Alphabet itself. From these instruments, from nothing (a blank piece of paper or silence) comes all things, whether uttered or written.

In order to penetrate this veil, or fusion of letters, numbers, and sounds, it then becomes necessary to understand how "number" is fused to Letters.  Further, we should not dismiss this idea of "exact proportion", of showing specific logic and patterns set into the Alphabet itself.

Linguistic Principles within the Sepher Yetzirah
Voiced and Unvoiced Pairings 



The two sounds of each letter are the hard and the soft - the aspirates and the softened.
Chapter 4, Paragraph 1

Speech is composed of two groups of sounds, which modern linguists call "voiced" and "unvoiced" or "voiceless".  Simply put, voiced sounds occur when the vocal chords vibrate as air passes over, while with unvoiced sounds, there is no air moving over the vocal chords and hence, no vibration.

The ratio of voiced:unvoiced is roughly 70:30 meaning that 70 percent of audible speech is comprised of sounds with vibration, while 30 percent of speech occurs where no vibration is effected on and over the vocal chords.

When viewed in terms of the Sepher Yetzirah, unvoiced (non-aspirated) letters are generally (though not in all cases) the "hard" sounds, while the voiced, or vibrated, are the softened, or aspirated.

One must not jump to simplistic conclusion, however, for there is bound to be some exceptions.

Consider, for instance, the compound sounds "CH" and "SH": the CH sound, as in the word CHURCH, is hard, while the "SH", as in the word SHRED, is the softened form of the CH, but itself remains unaspirated, or unvoiced. 

CH = HARD ; SH = SOFT

The TH pairing may be either voiced or unvoiced.  "TH" in the word THIS is the "softened", or voiced, while it is hardened and unvoiced in the word THIRTY.  In this particular case, we have a prime example of a "letter", or "letter pairing" that represents "two sounds of each letter".

Another example of a letter that has "two sounds" is the letter S.  The word SCISSORS, for instance, is an example where the Letter S represents two sounds, the hardened and the softened, the unvoiced and voiced.  The beginning S is hardened (unvoiced), while the middle SS and ending S is voiced, taking the sound of Z.

Not all letters will have two sounds, but instead have their own paired letter.

D is soft - T is hard
B is soft - P is hard
V is soft - F is hard

The modern academic science of Linguistics has developed into a comprehensive science of human speech, but it as shown, it remains that the Sepher Yetzirah clearly references an innate understanding of speech sound groupings.


Phonemes.  Building Blocks of Speech


These twenty-two sounds or letters are formed by the voice, impressed on the air, and audibly modified in five places; in the throat, in the mouth, by the tongue, through the teeth, and by the lips.
Chapter 2, Paragraph 3
Speech, as discussed, consists of sounds that want in and out of two realms: voiced and unvoiced.  Within these two realms lie the basic building blocks of speech, or the "phonemes".  Phonemes are the basic building blocks of language.

Phonemes, like the two categories of speech, themselves are divided into two basic components.  These are the vowels and consonants.  Vowels are unique in that there is never any obstruction by the lips or tongue.  The Letter M is effected by closing the lips, the letter D is effected by a quick tap of the alveolar bone behind the teeth, while the Letters A, E, I, O, and U are effected with the mouth open.

The balance of the letters are effected by some obstruction, whether the lips, tongue, or mouth.  These letters are called the CONSONANTS.  Perhaps it is best to classify these two pairing as follows:

VOWELS = OPEN = O
CONSONANTS = CLOSED = 1

In English, there are 26 letters, but 44 sounds, or phonemes.

When considering the fusion of Letters to Number, each individual phoneme would, theoretically, require its own unique glyph and letter placement.  Such an Alphabet we could consider to be "phonemic" and each unique phoneme would be connected to individual letters which further would have its own unique number.  This is uniquely true of the Devanagari script of India where each letter and its resultant sound has its own signifier (glyph/letter).(1)

Such is not the case in English.  As the Sepher Yetirah discusses, letters have two sounds.  The letters are not being cast into individual phonemic matrices, but rather maintain their positions while possessing the properties of multiple sounds.

The Letter C, for instance, using modern linguistic analysis, comprises 5 sounds:

C(k), C(s), C(sh), C(ts), and C(tch).

CAT, CIRRUS, OCEAN, CURRENCY, and CELLO

The model of "hardness" and "softness" for the letter C as in CAT is the letter G as in GOOD.

Modern linguistics now provides a comprehensive analysis of  phonemes to include the development of an "International Phonetic Alphabet", but the Sepher Yetzirah clearly postulated the idea of "phonemes" and sound pairings long before the academic science of linguistics entered Western academic circles.

What remains is a comprehensive study of the mathematics, or the use of number as assigned or "fused" to "letters".

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Hermetic Qaballa and the Isisian Codes - "The Fetch" on The Brian Ruhe Show

"The Fetch" appeared on "The Brian Ruhe Show" on Tuesday, July 10, 2018.  The show was broadcast live on Revolution Radio and recorded locally.  The discussion focused on "The Isisian Codes and Hermetic Qaballa" and included a series of slides to help accentuate the discussion.

Some of the key points of discussion included the Sepher Yetzirah, or Book of Formation, as being a pseudo-linguisitc exposition that links phonetics/linguistics to esoteric constructions.  One point of reference is that the Sepher Yetzirah discusses how sounds are made and makes a direct reference to aspirated and non-aspirated sounds.  This is known also as "voiced" and "non-voiced" and is integral to how the "past tense" is voiced in the English language.

Voiced sounds contain a vibratory feature that emanates from the throat and can be heard when the past tense is sounded with a "d".  Words as "destroyed", "constructed", or "played" are but some examples.

Non-voiced, or non-aspirated sounds are those that do not have a vibratory component.  These sounds are not random, but rather are mathematically patterned into the English alphabet.  The non-aspirated, or non-voiced, are the letters C, F, K, P, S, and X and are counted at the 3-6-11 of each half of the alphabet, the 11 being "3 in from the end of the respective half" equally. These letters form the hard "t" when voicing the "past tense", e.g,, "picked", "waxed", "knifed", etc.

In addition to aspects of esoteric potentiality contained in within this observation, the Masonic Grand Arch, 666, and quite a bit more can be found in this discussion.

More of an over view for those who have delved deeper into the Isisian Codes, but nonetheless, interesting to listen to.

You can enjoy it here.




Wednesday, January 17, 2018

This is the END - Peering into the "10"

In Plutarch's Isis and Osiris, we find the following at Section 1, 3:12-13,
"...the true votary of Isis is he who, when he has legitimately received what is set forth in the ceremonies connected with these gods, uses reason in investigating and in studying the truth contained therein."
Also, in the Book of Formation, or the Sepher Yetzirah, we are told that the Construct is such that the Letters are as if located on a sphere and may be rotated this way or that.

Each of these concepts shall be demonstrated within this article.

Words as IQ Testing

The use of Logic and Reason are paramount to understanding the nature of how the Construct was embed into language.  A simple way to view this concept is consider that crafted words as akin to a form of IQ test wherein patterns reveal the mathematical values that underlie various letters in words.  In most cases, crafted words often take on a form of mathematical equation or drop down style cipher. 

Take, for example, this simple question from an IQ test:




The 5th daughter's name is Nunu, for we have a simple pattern where the vowel is changing from A of Nana to E of Nene to I of Nini to O of Nono.  As the vowel pattern in English is AEIOU, those versed in English should be easily able to comprehend the answer.

Although simple, one had to employ logic and reason to acquire the answer.

Another form we may analyze patterns is through mathematical patterns as shown here:


 The answer, of course, is 52, but still one had to apply some logic and reason in able to ascertain the answer.  In this case, we are simply looking at a mathematical progression wherein the second integer in the formula was multiplied by an increasing number of 1:


Although these are very simple examples of IQ testing, the principles of how to solve for these simple alphanumeric equations is not all that different as to what is required and should be applied to the analysis of words as crafted, coded constructions.

The Number 6 (IX)

The first order of "Order" is the 6 and the 9, or a "s-pi-ral galaxy".  Without the ability of mass to coagulate and form order, physical existence has no ability to manifest as it cannot manifest into an orderless world/Universe.

However, within the Qaballistic Arts, the Letters and Words themselves should provide us with the necessary insights to discern such basic truths as referenced above.

The idea that a spiral galaxy cannot have a 6 without its "other half", or the "9", goes without saying.  In this way, the language is fused thus to Nature.  This being so, we are able to unlock the philosophical mystery.

To accomplish this, however, we must, again, use logic and reason.

Just as the simplified IQ test questions above show, through the formulation of Words we are given a series of patterns and from these patterns we must discern, using logic and reason, the appropriate answer to the underlying philosophical riddle, or truth, contained within the word.  However, in the case of Words, the Words are themselves the sole presentation of the underlying "patterns" or "formulas".

Thus, in the naming of the word SIX, we can easily see that in the word SIX is the Roman Numeral IX, or 9.  Since we cannot have a 9 without a 6, we must discern how, precisely, the Letter S of the formula S-IX, becomes a SIX.

Here, we see that the Letter S, being located at the number 3, must be SUMMED from 1 to itself:

S = Sum of 1:3 = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6

We have established a pattern not only in how numbers are being fused to letters and sounds, but also a form of pattern which reveals that simple 3 digit words are presenting us with two different concepts within the word.

You cannot make a SIX without a Nine, perhaps, is a clever clue to require those who do not know the riddle enough a real enough substantive clue to solve for the riddle of SIX. 

But that would deny the unfolding onion.

S = Half the formula within the word
IX = Half the formula within the word

This simple observation shall be applied to the word TEN.

The Number 10

Just as the word S-IX shows a number fused to a philosophical "truth", in that you cannot make a 6 without a 9 as the 6 and the 9 are the first order of "Order" in the Universe for the manifestation of Life, so too in the word TEN do we find the idea that you cannot make a TEN without a T or n N.

In the word TEN, we have the same construction as the word XIX.  Wherein in the word SIX we can easily see the Roman numeral IX, or 9, in the word TEN, the trailing number reveals itself as the Letter N, but as the lower-case "n".

This is accomplished by utilizing the Egyptian numbering system wherein we see that the lower case "n" is simply the glyph for the number 10.

That N and T are one and the same is additionally supported via phonetic encoding.

In English, the "teens" are essentially the original 3-9 digits with added suffix, or ending of "teen".  However, in the construction of the word TEEN, we are being reminded of two letters functioning as the number 10: TE and EN.  As counting moves forward, TWENTY (two and T), THIRTY (3 x T), forty (4 x T), FIFTY (5 x T), and so forth all remind us that the Letter T must have as its value a total of 10. 

Hence SIXTY is simply SIX times (x) T), or 60. 

Arabic, too, utilizing the TEEN sound set to denote the "tens".  Whereas 14 is oft pronounced "arba-thosh", even as it is spelled "arba-eshr", the "eshr" sound does not become prominent until 20, whereby the word for 20 is oft heard and pronounced as "oshreen".

The "een" sound will be used for a count of "ten",  Hence, "arba-een" is 4 (arbb) x 10 (een), 50 is kams (5) x -(10) een.

So while English uses the "een" sound to denote the first table of 10, Arabic uses the "een" sound to denote multiples of ten within the count sequence.  Each, however, is using the TE EN phonetic set.  English counts Ten as T while Arabic counts Ten as "een".

We must then study the placement of these phonetics against a phonetic grid (the Alphabet). 

The Letter T is located at 20, which reveals "nn".  When placed into the Isisian Codes, the Letter T is located at number 4, and again, the sum of 1:4 is 10.  Within ordinal code placement (the standard value of a letter's location in the Alphabet), the Letter T, being placed at 20, would sum from one to itself and arrive at a total value of 210, which is co-relationally "two tens", or "nn".

Meanwhile, the Letter N's ordinal value placement is 14.  Again, using numbers co-relationally, 14 can be viewed as "the Sum of 1:4" which would arrive us back at 10.

No matter how you deconstruct the word TEN, comprised as it is of the Letters T and N(n), it becomes inescapable that the placement, design, and usage of the T and the N revolves around the number 10 and awaits a revealing of even higher, hidden philosophical encoding into the number and design of the Letters T and N.

This is The END

The final piece of the puzzle/riddle may be found in the word END.

The natural counting digits are TEN in nature: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.

The TEN is the END in that T's and D's are one and the same. 

Simply rotate the D at the word END to the beginning of the word, to form the word DEN and then simply replace the D with a T to arrive back at TEN.

Since every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end.  he number 10 must then represent not only a new beginning, but a recognition of something that has ended, which would then be something that has passed.

Thus in English, we find that the phonetics of the Letters D, T, and N are the vast majority of representative sounds used to represent the past.

To change verbs in English to a "past tense", for regular verbs we simply add "ED" under a variety of rules.  However, the phonetics will take on either hard (T) or soft (D) sound.

CRUSHED is an example of a hard sound (T) ending, while CREATED represents a soft (D) sound.  N, meanwhile, remains the most prominent sound when expressing the past or present participle, either of which represents some action that has some relation to the past.

Hence "to hide" will become "hid" will become "hidden"....