"ONLY LIES PRINTED" - Protocol 10 of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
We must distinquish between lies and truth, for this, ultimately, is the object and aim of Occult study. To be able to peer into the darkness sure footed, to be able to view the totality of reality as opposed to the fragments that are intended; these are sanquine fruits of all our efforts.
We must be educated into the ways of deception, but even more so into the ways of the Construct.
During the run-up to the invastion of Iraq in 2003, a curious side show occured. As part of the grand scheme of lies being crafted through control of the press, a story came out that Niger was trying to sell Iraq "yellow cake", a key ingredient for the manufacture of nuclear weapons. Of course, like nearly everything coming from what is essentially a Jewish controlled press, the story was a lie, but this did not deter the editors and talking heads from seeking to aid in the selling of the story ad nauseum.
As part of an apparent pre-emtive strike against those forces who could check the lies of the "Niger yellow cake" story, Robert Novack, on July 14, 2003, released a bombshell: Valerie Plame, the wife of a former Ambassador to Niger, Joseph C. Wilson IV, was a CIA Agent. Overnight, Valerie Plame, the grand daughter of the emigrated Ukrainian Rabbi Plamevotski, had effectively seen her career as a CIA agent, terminated.
In order to cover for the leak of a CIA asset, rumors began circulating through the controlled press that it was "common knowledge" that Plame was a CIA asset. All of this was so because, according to the crafted lie, it was none other than former Ambassador Wilson who said so.
Arriving right on cue was a Fox News "military analyst" by the name of Maj. General Paul Vallely. Vallely would claim (bold faced lie, really) that former Ambassador Wilson personally had told him that Valerie was a CIA agent, a charge that the Wilson's denied and for which they sought a retraction from Maj. General Vallely.
What Fox News conveniently neglected (planned lies and deception by a Zionist company) was that Maj. General Paul Vallely, retired, was a known psyops agent and one of the primary architects of using the media to turn lies into reality.
Maj. General Paul Vallely, retired, was simply taking a page from the Protocols of Zion and dressing it all up in a contemporary manner such that the strategies contained in the Protocols of Zion would become defacto US Military policy.
MindWar - the Essence of Setianist Metaphysics
In 1980, a "High Priest" in the Temple of Set, Major Michael Aquino, teamed with then Col. Paul Vallely to pen a conceptual document intending to redefine "psychological warfare". This pamphlet, entitled "From Psyop to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory", would become a seeming unwritten policy of America's Israeli centric elite, and its implementation would be thrust into the mainstream with the attack on the Republic of Iraq in 2003.
Even the author of MindWar admits to this when he states in the most recent forward,
"..it was with some fascination that I saw specific prescriptions applied during the first Gulf War, and recently even more obviously during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. In both cases, extreme PSYOP was directed both against the object of the attack and upon U.S. domestic public perceptin and opionion, in 2003 to the extend of "embedding" journalists with military units to inevitably channel their perspectives and perceptions."
Putting aside the FACT that it is ILLEGAL for the military to engage in PSYOPS against the American people, the reality is that MindWar is specifically designed to control all perceptions such that all participants in a conflict, whether foreign or domestic, MUST BE TARGETED.
Says the author,
"MindWar must target all participants if it is to be effective. It must not only weaken the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining emphasizing to our people the rationale for our national interest in a specific war."
MindWar is simply a play straight out of the Protocols of Zion.
It is a concept through which overwhelming force is brought to bear on the minds of the targets, be such foreign or domestic. This force is brought about through the actual and total control of media assets. Indeed, MindWar relies on the overt use of controlled media to create realities that, if they do not exist today, will exist at some point in the future. To quote the authors again.
"It is deliberate in that it is planned, systemic, and comprehensive effort involving all levels of activity from the strategic to the tactical. It is aggressive because opinions and attitudes must be actively changed from those antagonistic to us to those supportive of us if we are to achieve victory. We will not win if we content ourselves with countering opinions and attitudes instilled in enemy governments. We must reach the before they resolve to support their armies, and we must reach those armies before our combat troops ever see them in the field."
In typical Setianist delusions, the document reads,
"...it must be axiomatic of MindWar that is always speaks the truth. Its power lies in its ability to focus recipients on the truth of the future as well as that of the present. MindWar thus involves the stated promise of the truth that the United States has resolved to make real if it is not already so."
MindWar is the strategic use of media assets against humanity.
Says the author again,
"To this end MindWar must be strategic in emphasis, with tactical applications playing a reinforcing role, supplementary role. In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globe - neither through primitive "battlefield" leaflets and loudspeakers or PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow effects of psychotronics - but through the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth."
MindWar and the Mindless Media
In typical Crowlian fashion, MindWar seeks to redefine reality. Like the legions who seek to redefine and otherwise re-order and number the English Alphabet, and in the process destroy inherent encoded truths, MindWar seeks to alter what is an inherent truth for that which is a fabricated truth - or a LIE sold repetitiously as "truth".
MindWar is Setianist in nature.
Setianism is rooted in Israel and Jewish religious thinking, and so we should expect that the adherents and proponents of MindWar would be found hawking pro-Israeli and Jewish agenda's while embed into the leadership of the United States.
Indeed, supporting such a statement was not even difficult to find.
In an ABC News radio show called "The Batchelor and Alexander Show", or "American Voices in Israel", Paul Vallely admits freely that MindWar was not only implemented, but that it was executed nearly flawlessly.
In a show on March 22, 2003, in a radio show entitled "Onward to Baghdad", at minute 6:00, Vallely stated,
"We have been pushing for a very long time, John, the use of psychological operations to win the hearts and minds of the people and with this being a war of liberation, how important it was to really communicate with them to save the lives of the innocent people" He went on to add, "..this thing (MindWar) has been carried off meticulously as far as I am concerned..."
Of course, ABC News, being headquartered in Israel, had no intention of divulging precisely the planned nature of what was really a criminal enterprise - the shakedown and genocide of a sovereign nation in service of Israeli interests. Even less was ABC News interested in divulging that Maj General Paul Vallely was linked to the Temple of Set or that Maj. General Vallely was the architect with the High Priest of the Temple of Set of the very document that shaped and continues to shape the way in which the media is used to advance a hidden, foreign, ulterior agenda.
Such is the manner in which we may define America's mass media as "the Mindless Press".
So I have a question. And I am totally not against anything you are saying but it is something I am often asked and I have no idea how to respond to it myself. So what do you say when people say that with this whole numerical method that you are just making stuff fit the model you want it to. Kind of like begging the questions or working backwards and finding examples that happen to fit your method. What do you say to people like that? I was just curious.
ReplyDeleteIn my case, I rarely get that anymore. It comes with knowing the concept better than most, I suppose, but I do get it from time to time.
ReplyDeleteMy responses really depend on the nature of the interaction.
At the end of the day, we know it is based on the Pi Proportion as referenced by Higgins. When you take multiple key words and show that they represent a Pi Proportion numerical value, what can they really say?
The numbers are what they are.
The only thing I do differently is I set the language into a pure phonetic matrix and then let the matrix speak for itself.
GOD = 7+15+4 = 26 weeks, or half a year.
SUN when set into a phonetic matrix reveals that S is 3 and N is 5, thus U must be its sum of 1:6, to reveal 365 days to a year.
No one is "fitting" anything to anything/
The numbers are what they are.
If I divide the Synodic Orbit of the Moon around the Earth to achieve its Pi Proportion, we know that the orbit is 27.3 days divided by 2 to arrive at 13.65.
M is 13, O is 6 and N is 5, or
MON = 13.65
Again. The numbers are what they are. If someone says that one is "just fitting the numbers" to arrive at the value, I tell them to prove that the numbers are lying and not revealing themselves.
The synodic orbit of VENUS is 225 days.
V is 22 and E is 5
VE =225
NUS (reversed) = SUN
Again.
Where is anyone fitting the numbers in a backwards scenario?
The numbers are what they are.
I invite them to prove me wrong...
All politicians, entertainers, talking heads have been Borne Identified to ensure the data they are given does not escape to unsecured channels. They are, as the TV program showed, 'their own worse enemy'.
ReplyDelete